exploding whale造句

• I don't think Uncyclopedia is unusual like an exploding whale.
• There have also been examples of spontaneously exploding whales.
• What do we need bad jokes for when we've got exploding whales?
• Ranging from Immanuel Kant to Exploding whale.
• :Exploding whale has numerous secondary sources.
• Perhaps best known as creator of Exploding whale, one of Wikipedia's quirkiest Administrators'noticeboard.
• Unfortunately, some of the best options had already appeared on the Main Page as featured articles, like exploding whale.
• In addition to copyediting, I have added footnotes to a number of articles, including feature articles Exploding Whale and Tooth Enamel.
• One article, the ever-popular Exploding whale, produced a bit of competition for the honor of recording it, with three revert rule.
• The " previous FAs " could link to exploding whale and other unusual articles that were already FA and therefore can't be used for 2006.
• Within a month of editing at Wikipedia you will have amassed a lifetime of knowledge about exploding whales, masturbating pigeons and how to suitly emphazi a question.
• I know I wouldn't want it on Exploding whale or Windows 2000 ! ! !-Ta bu shi da yu 08 : 16, 4 July 2005 ( UTC)
• That being said Wikipedia isn't run by robots, and I don't think it would go amiss to feature Exploding whale that day or do something of the sort.
• I will repeat myself : Exploding whale is both one of the oldest articles in wikipedia, and a featured article, which means there is consensus that this is a good article.
• Exploding whales never fails to make me laugh and I have stumbled across many articles randomly that I enjoy, I have a list on my user page of the top five or six.
• Remember Exploding whale et al, where humans keept getting deleted but other organisms didn't . . . Thanks !-- Cerejota 18 : 32, 24 July 2007 ( UTC)
• Every good encylopedia includes exploding whales !-- oHelp 02 : 12, 28 July 2006 ( UTC ) The second part can be removed if you like, or they can be seperated.
• It's reasonable to feature, say, " exploding whale "; it would be quite different to feature an article about the " whale's " venerated anatomy.
• Some Wikipedia articles on esoteric subjects are the " best " resource you will find online ( See Nafaanra language, execution by elephant, Rupert D'Oyly Carte or exploding whale ).
• It's featured, and by your argument, it shouldn't exist because its a synthesis of all the sources covering various exploding whales .-- Urthogie 00 : 12, 22 July 2007 ( UTC)